I recently started reading a book called "The
Essential Writings of Ghandi” at about the same time my family and I took a
trip to Washington D.C. While we were there we visited the Holocaust Museum. I
remember coming home that night and reading the next chapter in this book which
was, coincidentally, about Gandhi’s view that Hitler could have been stopped
through non-violent resistance. The horror of what I’d seen at the Holocaust
Museum that morning was still fresh in my mind. I remember closing the book and
shaking my head in disbelief. "How could Gandhi believe that non-violence
could have stopped Hitler?" I wondered. It’s one thing to use non-violence
to change the culture of a land, or to resist an unjust law, but Hitler’s
regime seems so much more evil than any of that. If people weren’t moved to lay
down their weapons when they saw thousands of Jewish women and children being
starved to death, or shot in the head, or burned alive in massive ovens, then
how could they possibly be moved by a show of solidarity and determination to
resist evil to the point of death?
Over the last few months I believe I’ve come to some
better understanding of what Gandhi meant, and also what a Christian
non-violent response could have accomplished against Hitler’s schemes.
Obviously what I'm going to share is complete
supposition. At best, I am only thinking out loud and inviting you to consider
these thoughts along with me.
What I wonder is what an organized, non-violent response
to Hitler might have accomplished. What if, from the beginning, the Jews and
others in Germany had collectively refused to cooperate with the injustices
imposed upon them and said, "You can kill us, but we will not wear the
Gold Stars. We will not comply with your racist and oppressive rules and
laws." What would have happened? Would it have made any difference?
As we consider this, let me remind you that non-violence
and passive resistance don't emphasize passivity. On the contrary, it requires
great courage and it involves laying one's life on the line to oppose
injustice. In other words, many people would probably have still died in the
battle. But, it would have been a battle where only one side was the aggressor
and the other side was a unified force that refused to go along with even the
tiniest injustice imposed against people – regardless of their own race or
creed.
What was missing from this equation was someone like MLK,
or Gandhi, or an inspired follower of Jesus who would lead the way. What was
required was someone who had an influence on the people, someone with a voice
who could inspire the people to agree together that they would not stand for
the racist laws, and that they would not comply in even the smallest way with
the unjust policies imposed upon them or others.
Not to place the blame on the victims, but history shows
us that, without such an inspiring leader to point the way, the Jews did what
everyone else would do in such a case – they mostly went along with what was
asked of them by their Government. They were good citizens who believed that
what was asked of them was something temporary, or inconvenient. None of them
had any idea just how deadly and malevolent the process would eventually
become.
Certainly some did resist the unjust laws and policies,
but those individuals were quickly killed or arrested to set an example to any others
who might attempt to resist. Those who watched these people being arrested or
killed probably wondered if it was worth the price they had to pay in order to
resist. However, it’s theoretically possible that, as in the case of MLK, or
Gandhi, if everyone together collectively agreed to resist - even to the point
of death - and regardless of how many of them were arrested or put to death, we
might have seen a vastly different outcome.
Of course, we do not know this for sure. I understand
that. I do.
Simply acquiescing to evil is not the same as passively
resisting it. As Gandhi famously said, (and I’m paraphrasing) "I will lay
down my life to oppose injustice and evil. But I will not kill anyone."
So, our commitment has to be to die for what is right - to fight - but not to
do violence or to kill anyone in the process.
As a follower of Christ, I'm skeptical about whether or
not anyone other than a follower of Jesus can ever actually do this. It’s not
that I believe Christians are more loving or self-sacrificing. It’s more that
I’m skeptical of any human ability to lay down their life for strangers. I'm
not sure I believe that anyone, apart from the indwelling love of Christ, is
capable of loving their enemies enough to lay down their lives and die to
themselves, and for one another, in such a way. For example, those who followed
Martin Luther King, Jr. did so because they were followers of Christ,
primarily. Those who marched were largely church members. Those who resisted to
the point of shedding their own blood were Christians. And, of course, they
were African-Americans. They were the oppressed.
Even Gandhi, I believe, had a basic faith in Christ that
informed his own passion for justice and inspired a willingness to follow
Jesus' example of overcoming evil with good, even to the point of death.
As an aside, Gandhi read the Sermon on the Mount every
day and wrote as much about Jesus in his writings as any modern Christian
author does. I wonder, what do you call someone who reads the words of Jesus
every day and puts his teachings on love and forgiveness and service and
self-sacrifice into practice? Regardless of whether or not Gandhi would have
called himself a Christian (and he wouldn't have), I personally feel that he
was a better follower of Jesus than I am at times, and perhaps a better
follower of Jesus than most American Christians.
Maybe I’m wrong about this, however. Again, this is all
supposition anyway. But, maybe with the right inspiration and an organized
non-violent strategy the Jews could have successfully stopped Hitler in the
earliest stages and the Holocaust could have been avoided. Or not.
Still, my mind goes back to the images of the death
camps. I see again in my memory the heart breaking despair and unbelievable
inhumanity expressed under the Nazi regime and I find it hard to accept that
anyone or anything could have stopped this evil, short of assassination or war.
But, was this war - the only viable candidate for
anything near to what could be referred to as a “Just War” – truly just? Was it truly the best possible solution to answer this atrocity?
Above all other wars in human history, World War Two
alone stands as the primary (if only) example of what a Just War could look
like. Laying aside for a moment whether or not you believe that a Just War is
even possible, let's look at the fruit of this “Just War.” What did it produce,
other than the eventual end of Nazi Germany?
*The development of nuclear weapons
*The death of 80k people in Hiroshima
*Another 60k dead due to radiation poisoning
*73k killed in Nagasaki
*Another 70k after that due to radiation
*50 plus years of Cold War escalation as nuclear weapons
proliferated between the US and Soviet Russia
*A total of over 70 million fatalities
Let’s remember that America did not enter the war in
order to stop Hitler. We knew all about what Hitler was doing to his people and
to neighboring nations and we did nothing. In fact, if it were not for the fact
that Japan dared to bomb Pearl Harbor we would never have considered entering
the war at all. So, if we are honest, we only entered the war when it was about
defending our own pride, not because the lives of others were at stake.
World War Two was the deadliest conflict in human
history. It brought about millions of deaths. It created the atomic monster
that continues to plague our world and threatens still to blow up the planet
ten times over.
Is that what a "Just War" looks like? Is this -
the best of all possible wars - really something we hope to emulate again?
Whether or not the war against Hitler was justified, the
costs were enormous, and it should cause us to rethink the idea of war and to
become desperate to find peaceful means to resolving future conflicts.
As followers of Jesus - the Prince of Peace - we need to
become experts in peace. We must take seriously the promise of Jesus when he
said, "Blessed are the peacemakers for they shall inherit the Earth."
Are we peacemakers? If not, are we really followers of
Jesus?
-kg
